Trump judge posts dissent video on California gun law

A judge appointed by former President Donald Trump has sparked controversy by posting a "dissent video" on YouTube. The video features Judge Lawrence VanDyke handling firearms in his chambers, as he disagrees with a decision by his colleagues regarding California's ban on large-capacity ammunition magazines. VanDyke's video aims to challenge the majority opinion that the ban is constitutional. He argues that the distinction between restricting magazines and firearms is flawed. In his nearly 19-minute video, VanDyke handles guns while explaining their features and discussing how the majority ruling could lead to further restrictions on firearm ownership. His colleagues criticized the video as "wildly improper." They argue that VanDyke overstepped his role, acting as an "expert witness" rather than a judge. State officials and legal scholars also expressed concern, suggesting that judges should not act like social media influencers. In response to the backlash, VanDyke defended his video in a written dissent, dismissing his colleagues as "amateur gunsmiths" and reiterating his views on the ruling. The incident raises questions about judicial conduct and the boundaries of dissent in legal opinions. It remains unclear if any official actions will follow from the controversy.