Fired federal workers allege discrimination against non-white men

Federal employees from various agencies have filed a class action complaint against the Trump administration. They claim they were unlawfully fired for participating in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) activities as part of a broader executive order issued by former President Trump. The complaint alleges that the administration targeted employees associated with DEI, even those not actively involved in such programs. This included individuals who only attended training or participated in employee resource groups. The employees argue that this action violated their First Amendment rights and disproportionately affected non-white male workers, which could be a violation of the Civil Rights Act. The complaint was filed with the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. This independent agency is responsible for protecting federal employees from political firings and other abuses. The former workers are seeking reinstatement to their jobs, back pay, and other damages. Many have already filed discrimination charges with federal offices. One of the complainants, Sherrell Pyatt, shared her feelings of being overlooked despite her qualifications. She noted that many in her team, who were put on administrative leave, were women and people of color. Another complainant, Mahri Stáinnak, expressed concern that the administration's actions harmed public services. Legal representatives claim there was a presumption that employees from specific demographics were threats to Trump's agenda. They argue this approach is both discriminatory and violates First Amendment rights. In addition to this class action, other lawsuits challenging the executive orders have emerged in federal courts. In one case, a federal judge temporarily halted the termination of grants related to DEI initiatives, suggesting that the orders might be “unconstitutionally vague.” However, the ruling is currently on hold pending appeal. The Justice Department argues that Trump's orders comply with free speech rights and questions the legal grounds for the complaints.